A copy of the records on contracts.ocp.dc.gov, the website where DC's Office of Contracting and Procurement publishes contracts, purchase orders and payments, as we pulled them. About this source. Not a complete record of District contracting or spending.
The rules behind the records on this site, for people new to DC procurement, with software and IT purchases in mind. Each rule links to its law or regulation; quoted words are the source's own.
This is a summary, not legal advice. It leaves out exceptions and detail, and the law changes. Read the linked source, or ask the Office of the Attorney General or agency counsel, before acting on anything here.
Where the rules change. Each row links to the section below that gives the source.
| Amount | Applies | What the law requires | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | or less | A contracting officer may buy without competitive quotes. | How a contract gets awarded |
| $25,000 | over | IT purchases by agencies under the Mayor go to OCTO for review. One OCTO hasn't reviewed "shall be deemed recommended for disapproval to the Chief Procurement Officer". | Technology purchases and OCTO |
| $100,000 | or less | Small purchase: at least three written quotes above $10,000. A purchase may not be split to stay under $100,000. | How a contract gets awarded |
| $100,000 | over | Competitive sealed bidding, unless the CPO issues a determination and findings (D&F) for another method. | How a contract gets awarded |
| $100,000 | or more | The contract goes in the portal's contract database, with the executed contract, all D&Fs and all modifications. | What the portal has to publish |
| $250,000 | or less | Set aside for small business enterprises (SBEs). | Small and local business rules |
| $250,000 | over | On non-construction government-assisted projects, at least 35% of the dollar volume subcontracted to SBEs, unless waived. | Small and local business rules |
| $1,000,000 | over, in a 12-month period | The Council must approve the contract, and each option year over the line goes back to the Council. | When the Council must approve |
The main law is the Procurement Practices Reform Act of 2010, D.C. Code § 2-351.01 and following. It sets up the Office of Contracting and Procurement (OCP), an independent agency run by the Chief Procurement Officer (CPO). Through the CPO, OCP has exclusive authority to administer the law, except where the law provides otherwise.
"There is established as an independent agency the Office of Contracting and Procurement, which shall be administered by the Chief Procurement Officer. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, OCP, through the CPO, shall have the exclusive authority to administer the provisions of this chapter." D.C. Code § 2-352.01(a)(1)
Contracts by agencies outside OCP may be missing from the portal or only partly there. See About this source.
The statute for the Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) tells it to review and approve all agency proposals, purchase orders and contracts for information technology and telecommunications, and to recommend approval or disapproval to the CPO.
"Review and approve all agency proposals, purchase orders, and contracts for the acquisition of information technology and telecommunications systems, resources, and services, and recommend approval or disapproval to the Chief Procurement Officer" D.C. Code § 1-1403(2)
Under the Home Rule Act, a contract involving more than $1,000,000 in spending during a 12-month period can't be made unless the Mayor sends it to the Council and the Council approves it.
"No contract involving expenditures in excess of $1,000,000 during a 12-month period may be made unless the Mayor submits the contract to the Council for its approval and the Council approves the contract" D.C. Code § 1-204.51(b)(1) (Home Rule Act)
The law lists the allowed methods (§ 2-354.01(a)(1)). Sole-source, emergency and special pilot awards need a written determination and findings (D&F): "a form of written approval and detailed explanation as a prerequisite to taking certain contract actions" (§ 2-351.04(28)).
| Method | When it's used | Key rules | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competitive sealed bids (Invitation for Bids) | The default over $100,000 | "Contracts exceeding $100,000 shall be awarded by competitive sealed bidding unless the CPO issues a determination and findings" otherwise. At least 14 days' public notice. The bid invitation says whether award goes on lowest price or lowest evaluated price. | § 2-354.02 |
| Competitive sealed proposals (Request for Proposals) | When sealed bidding is "not practicable or not advantageous" | At least 21 days' notice. Must weigh price, quality and past performance. Negotiation allowed. | § 2-354.03 |
| Small purchase | Up to $100,000 | No quotes needed at $10,000 or less; at least three written quotes above that. Purchases may not be "parceled, split, divided" to stay under $100,000. | § 2-354.07; 27 DCMR § 1800 |
| Sole source | "only one source for the required good or service" | D&F; notice posted at least 10 days before award; contract online within 7 days. Can't be justified by "lack of adequate advance planning" or "Pending expiration of budget authority". | § 2-354.04; 27 DCMR § 1700 |
| Emergency | "imminent threat to the public health, welfare, property, or safety" or "serious disruption in agency operations" | No longer than 90 days (120 if the thing takes longer to develop). D&F; notice within 7 days. Can't be stretched to expand scope or time except to bridge to a regular contract. | § 2-354.05; 27 DCMR § 1702 |
| Exempt from competition | A list set by law | Includes software maintenance from the only source, items "federal or District law prescribes" a vendor for, copyrighted material bought from the owner, and services from another public body. | § 2-354.13 |
| Special pilot | "an unusual or unique situation", including to "Obtain a new technology" | Prior public notice, "as much competition as is practicable", D&F posted within 7 days. | § 2-354.08 |
| Cooperative purchasing | Buying with or through another government | Needs the CPO's authorization. | § 2-354.11 |
| GSA schedule | Buying off a federal GSA schedule | The CPO must make sure the price is reasonable. | § 2-354.10 |
| DC Supply Schedule (DCSS) | Contracts with certified business enterprises | A District schedule "under which contracts may be awarded to certified business enterprises". | § 2-354.12 |
| Human care agreement | Health, education and social services delivered to individuals | Providers qualify through a request for qualifications; the agreement is "not a commitment to purchase any quantity". | § 2-354.06 |
The law also lists reverse auctions and infrastructure methods, not covered here. The CPO must "publish annually on the Internet a report on the number of and dollar value of contracts executed under each source selection method" (§ 2-354.01(a)(2)). The portal's "market type" field does not record the method reliably; see the column note on the contracts page.
A certified business enterprise (CBE) is a local business certified by the Department of Small and Local Business Development (DSLBD) (§ 2-218.02). A small business enterprise (SBE) must also be a local business enterprise and meet a size test (§ 2-218.32).
"Set Aside" is a value in the portal's market type field, typed by the District (a few periods spell it "Set-Aside"). Both spellings are shown on the contracts page as entered and not checked against these rules.
The contract type says how the price works. The law lets the District use "any type of contract which will promote the best interests of the District", within limits (§ 2-355.03), and bans one outright: "An agency shall not enter into a cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost contract" (§ 2-355.01). Definitions below are from 27 DCMR § 2499 unless another source is given. Each name links to the contracts with that value in the portal's contract type field.
| Type (as the portal spells it) | What it means | Who carries the cost risk |
|---|---|---|
| Firm Fixed Price | A set price "not subject to any adjustment on the basis of the contractor's cost experience". To be used "when the risk involved is minimal" (§ 2402.2). | The contractor: it "places maximum risk and full responsibility for all costs and resulting profit or loss upon the contractor". |
| Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment | A fixed price that moves "upward and downward" on events "specifically defined in the contract", such as published price or labor-cost changes. | Mostly the contractor; the District takes the defined price swings. |
| Fixed Price Incentive | Profit goes up or down by formula as final cost lands under or over a target, up to a price ceiling. | Shared up to the ceiling; over it, "the contractor will absorb the difference as a loss" (§ 2408.2). |
| Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity | Orders placed as needed, between a stated minimum and maximum. The regulation calls it an "indefinite-quantity contract": it "requires the District to order and the contractor to furnish at least a stated minimum" (§ 2416.8–2416.9). | This type fixes how much can be bought, not how it is priced. Past the minimum, the amount on the portal is a ceiling, not a commitment to spend it. |
| Requirements | Covers "all actual purchase requirements of designated District agencies" for an item over a period; quantities are estimates and money is obligated order by order (§ 2416.4, 2416.7). | As for indefinite quantity. |
| Time And Materials | Pays "direct labor hours at specified fixed hourly rates" plus materials at cost. Only allowed when costs can't be estimated and the contracting officer finds in writing "that no other type of contract is suitable" (§ 2420.1). | The District pays for every hour worked, up to a ceiling "that the contractor exceeds at its own risk" (§ 2420.2). |
| Labor Hour | "a variant of the time-and-materials contract differing only in that materials are not supplied by the contractor." | As for time and materials. |
| Cost Plus Fixed Fee | A cost-reimbursement contract with "payment of a fixed fee" that "does not vary with actual cost". | The District. Cost-reimbursement contracts pay "allowable costs incurred" up to a ceiling, and may be used only when costs can't be estimated well enough for a fixed price (§ 2405.1), backed by a D&F that it is cheaper or the only practical way (§ 2-355.02). |
| Cost Plus Incentive Fee | Costs plus a fee "adjusted later by a formula based on the relationship of total allowable costs to total target costs". | The District, as for Cost Plus Fixed Fee. |
| Cost Plus Award Fee Contract | Costs plus a base fee and an extra fee awarded on "a judgmental evaluation by the contracting officer". | The District, as for Cost Plus Fixed Fee. |
| Letter Contract | A preliminary agreement; see above. | The District's liability under the letter contract is capped at 50% of the price ceiling. |
The type is whatever the District entered on each contract's portal page. A contract's type here is not checked against its paperwork.
The contracts page marks a few contracts whose posted paperwork shows they weren't bid out the usual way. These are read by hand from the documents and recorded in of_interest.yaml. They are not findings of wrongdoing. We read the paperwork only for current contracts whose attached file names mention a sole source, emergency, letter contract or extension, or whose record looked unusual, so a contract with no badge may simply not have been read. Each badge links to the contracts that carry it.
| Badge | What it means under the law | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Sole source | Awarded without competition because "there is only one source for the required good or service". Needs a D&F and a public notice 10 days before award. | § 2-354.04 |
| Sole-source extension past the last option | Extended beyond the total term the contract allowed. The rule requires a written finding by the CPO and a justification "for using a sole source modification". | 27 DCMR § 2005.2(b); § 2-354.04 |
| Exempt from competition | A purchase on the statute's list of exemptions, such as software support from its only source or a vendor that "federal or District law prescribes". | § 2-354.13 |
| Emergency procurement | Bought under emergency procedures for a threat to health or safety or a serious disruption. Limited to 90 days (120 in some cases). | § 2-354.05 |
| Letter contract | Work started under a preliminary agreement before the full contract was signed. | 27 DCMR § 2425 |
| Special pilot procurement | Awarded without sealed bids or proposals because of "an unusual or unique situation", which can include obtaining "a new technology". | § 2-354.08 |
| Rider or cooperative purchase | Bought through a contract another government or agency already had, rather than a new competition. The law calls this cooperative purchasing, which the CPO must authorize. "Rider" covers the case where the paperwork instead cites a rider clause (in one contract here, the "Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Rider Clause") to order off another agency's existing contract. The statute does not define "rider". | § 2-354.11 |
| Grew or slipped after award | After a non-competitive award, the paperwork shows the contract grew a lot or its delivery moved out a long way. This is a description, not a legal category; changes like these are made by contract modification or change order. | § 2-351.04(9), (15) |
The CPO must run a public procurement website (§ 2-361.04). At a minimum it must include:
Agencies outside the CPO's authority "shall transmit the information required by this section to the CPO for posting" (§ 2-361.04(c)). Separate posting deadlines apply to sole-source awards (contract online within 7 days, § 2-354.04(d)) and emergency awards (notice with D&F and contract within 7 days, § 2-354.05(f)).
This page says what the law requires, not whether the portal meets it. For what the portal holds, as we pulled it, see About this data.